In order to build 2 new golf courses, the new golf plan seems to require not only the land area previously occupied by 3 golf courses, but some extra land as well. One of the reasons may very well be the intention of digging many, many more lagoons than are currently present. More water, less land. Very costly. But maybe when they talk about the mysterious "400 acres" that the new courses supposedly occupy, they're not counting the water areas to come up with that low number?